User talk:WillKallander

Buku — Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:50:46 GMT

Only the Eternal Buddha Shakyamuni Possesses True Cause Without a Beginning

New page

'''Only the Eternal Buddha Shakyamuni Possesses True Cause Without a Beginning'''

Something may now be inherent but wasn’t always inherent. An example is a gene that has been introduced into a genome. Another example is found in the Lotus Sutra in the parable of the poor man with the gem sewn into his coat. The man inherently possessed the gem but only after it had been sown into the lining. This is True Cause with a beginning. Only the Eternal Buddha possesses True Cause with no beginning. That is why he is the Eternal Master and to whom we owe our deepest gratitude. No one, save for the Eternal Buddha Shakyamuni, has realized the Great Law of Namu Myoho renge kyo through his own efforts. Those others who have realized this Law have done so by virtue of this Buddha. There is no independent realization of the Great Law. This is the true meaning of mentor-disciple. Believing there is (an independent realization of the Great Law) or mis-attributing the sower of the seed is the source of the SGI’s arrogance.

User:Buku

Buku — Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:42:51 GMT

New user account

New page

LotusWiki - Recent changes [en]

User talk:WillKallander

User:Buku